Liquidity Requirements: A Double-Edged Sword

Philipp König ()

International Journal of Central Banking, 2015, vol. 11, issue 4, 129-168

Abstract: This paper shows that bank liquidity regulation may be a “double-edged sword.” Under certain conditions, it may hamper, rather than strengthen, a bank’s resilience to financial stress. The reason is the existence of two opposing effects of liquidity regulation, a liquidity effect and a solvency effect. The liquidity effect arises because a bank mitigates its risk of illiquidity when it increases its liquidity buffer. The solvency effect arises because a larger liquidity buffer reduces the bank’s returns and may therefore raise its insolvency risk. Liquidity regulation is effective in reducing a bank’s overall default risk only if the former effect dominates the latter. The paper derives conditions under which this is the case and discusses the resulting relationship between capital and liquidity regulation.

JEL-codes: G21 G28 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ijcb.org/journal/ijcb15q5a4.pdf (application/pdf)
http://www.ijcb.org/journal/ijcb15q5a4.htm (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ijc:ijcjou:y:2015:q:5:a:4

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Central Banking is currently edited by Loretta J. Mester

More articles in International Journal of Central Banking from International Journal of Central Banking
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bank for International Settlements ().