To Respond or Not to Respond: Measures of the Output Gap in Theory and in Practice

Guy Segal

International Journal of Central Banking, 2017, vol. 13, issue 2, 73-120

Abstract: This paper analyzes the implications of responding to either the model-based New Keynesian output gap or to its estimates, and in particular, a Hodrick-Prescott-filtered output gap or a linearly detrended output gap. Responding to these estimates instead of to the “true” unobserved output gap generates longlasting business cycles and lower welfare. Furthermore, correlations between the estimates and the theoretical output gap depend on the stochastic structure of the shocks affecting the economy. In particular, productivity shocks generate a negative such correlation. Hence, the output gap estimates may provide poor guidance to monetary policy.

Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ijcb.org/journal/ijcb17q2a3.pdf (application/pdf)
http://www.ijcb.org/journal/ijcb17q2a3.htm (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ijc:ijcjou:y:2017:q:2:a:3

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Central Banking is currently edited by Loretta J. Mester

More articles in International Journal of Central Banking from International Journal of Central Banking
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bank for International Settlements ().