EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

An analysis of the distribution of extremes in indices of share returns in the US, UK and Japan from 1963 to 2000

G. D. Gettinby, C. D. Sinclair, D. M. Power and R. A. Brown
Additional contact information
G. D. Gettinby: Department of Accountancy and Business Finance, The University of Dundee, UK, Postal: Department of Accountancy and Business Finance, The University of Dundee, UK
C. D. Sinclair: Department of Accountancy and Business Finance, The University of Dundee, UK, Postal: Department of Accountancy and Business Finance, The University of Dundee, UK
D. M. Power: Department of Accountancy and Business Finance, The University of Dundee, UK, Postal: Department of Accountancy and Business Finance, The University of Dundee, UK
R. A. Brown: Department of Accountancy and Business Finance, The University of Dundee, UK, Postal: Department of Accountancy and Business Finance, The University of Dundee, UK

International Journal of Finance & Economics, 2006, vol. 11, issue 2, 97-113

Abstract: This paper seeks to characterize the distribution of extreme returns for US, UK and Japanese equity indices over the years 1963-2000. In particular, the suitability of the following distributions is investigated: Normal, Frechet, Gumbel, Weibull, Generalized Extreme Value (GEV), Generalized Pareto and Generalized Logistic (GL). Daily returns were obtained for each of the countries, and the minima over a variety of selection intervals were calculated. Plots of higher moment statistics for the minima on statistical distribution maps suggested that the best fitting distribution would be either the GEV or the GL. The results from fitting each of these distributions to extremes of a series of US, UK and Japanese share returns supported the preliminary evidence that the GL distribution best fitted the data in all three countries over the period of study. The GL distribution has fatter tails than the GEV distribution; hence this finding is of importance to investors who are concerned with assessing the risk of a portfolio. The paper highlights the important finance implications and in particular the potential for underestimation of risk if distributions without fat enough tails are employed. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/ijfe.280 Link to full text; subscription required (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ijf:ijfiec:v:11:y:2006:i:2:p:97-113

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://jws-edcv.wile ... PRINT_ISSN=1076-9307

DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.280

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Finance & Economics is currently edited by Mark P. Taylor, Keith Cuthbertson and Michael P. Dooley

More articles in International Journal of Finance & Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and Christopher F. Baum ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ijf:ijfiec:v:11:y:2006:i:2:p:97-113