Capital market integration, currency crises, and exchange rate regimes 1990-2002
Ephraim Clark (),
Amel Zenaidi and
Monia Gharbi Trabelsi
Additional contact information
Amel Zenaidi: Institut des Hautes Etudes Commerciales, Université du 7 novembre à Carthage, Tunisia, Postal: Institut des Hautes Etudes Commerciales, Université du 7 novembre à Carthage, Tunisia
Monia Gharbi Trabelsi: Institut des Hautes Etudes Commerciales, Université du 7 novembre à Carthage, Tunisia, Postal: Institut des Hautes Etudes Commerciales, Université du 7 novembre à Carthage, Tunisia
International Journal of Finance & Economics, 2008, vol. 13, issue 3, 280-306
The international capital market integration and currency crises of the last decade have renewed the debate on optimal exchange rate regimes. Research is mixed regarding what their effect has been on the system of exchange rate regimes and the anchor currencies at the centre of the system. The debate is complicated by growing empirical evidence that the de jure regimes announced by governments often differ from the de facto regimes that are actually applied. In this paper we divide the period 1990-2002 according to the major crises and use the generalized method of moments to identify the individual de facto regimes and relevant anchor currencies for each sub-period. We find that although intermediate regimes as a percentage of the overall database remained stable over the three periods, the type of peg and anchor currencies varied considerably. Pegs on a single currency fell from 62% of the sample in the first period to 49% in the second period, then rose to 66% in the third period. Basket pegs rose from 33% in the first period to 51% in the second period and back to 34% in the third period. Independent floats disappeared after the first period. When we group countries according to their access to capital markets, we find that all nine of the developed countries in the sample followed some type of intermediate regime for all three periods. We also find a trend towards hard pegs in the group of countries that has managed to increase its integration in the international capital markets. Our results also suggest that the US dollar remains the main anchor currency in the international financial system, even after the major currency crises and the rise of the euro. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/ijfe.338 Link to full text; subscription required (text/html)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ijf:ijfiec:v:13:y:2008:i:3:p:280-306
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://jws-edcv.wile ... PRINT_ISSN=1076-9307
Access Statistics for this article
International Journal of Finance & Economics is currently edited by Mark P. Taylor, Keith Cuthbertson and Michael P. Dooley
More articles in International Journal of Finance & Economics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing ().