Comparative Analyses of Expected Shortfall and Value-at-Risk: Their Estimation Error, Decomposition, and Optimization
Yasuhiro Yamai and
Additional contact information
Yasuhiro Yamai: Institute for Monetary & Econ Studies, Bank of Japan
Toshinao Yoshiba: Institute for Monetary & Econ Studies, Bank of Japan
Monetary and Economic Studies, 2002, vol. 20, issue 1, 87-121
We compare expected shortfall with value-at-risk (VaR) in three aspects: estimation errors, decomposition into risk factors, and optimization. We describe the advantages and the disadvantages of expected shortfall over VaR. We show that expected shortfall is easily decomposed and optimized while VaR is not. We also show that expected shortfall needs a larger size of sample than VaR for the same level of accuracy.
JEL-codes: G13 G32 D81 G11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (34) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ime:imemes:v:20:y:2002:i:1:p:87-121
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Monetary and Economic Studies from Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kinken ().