Exchange Rate Regimes in the Americas: Is Dollarization the Solution?

Vittorio Corbo

Monetary and Economic Studies, 2002, vol. 20, issue S1, 91-111

Abstract: The series of crises that have affected emerging markets in recent years have reopened the debate on the most appropriate exchange regime for an emergent economy. In particular, all countries that experienced severe crises in the 1990s had some sort of fixed exchange rate regime, the majority of them falling in the categories that Corden ( 2002) calls the fixed-but-adjustable exchange rate regime (FBAR) and in- between regimes of the pegged (including flexible and crawling pegs) and target zone types. As a result, in recent years countries have been emigrating to a corner solution: a credible fixed regime or a floating regime with a monetary anchor. Within the latter categories, the increasingly used monetary regime is the inflation targeting one. The paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of alternative exchange rate regimes and ends with a discussion of the possibility of dollarization in the Americas.

JEL-codes: E31 E42 E52 F33 O23 O24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.imes.boj.or.jp/research/papers/english/me20-s1-6.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Exchange Rate Regimes in the Americas: Is Dollarization the Solution? (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ime:imemes:v:20:y:2002:i:s1:p:91-111

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Monetary and Economic Studies from Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kinken ().