Professionalism: The Need for Standards

Garry D. Brewer
Additional contact information
Garry D. Brewer: The Rand Corporation

Interfaces, 1973, vol. 4, issue 1, 20-27

Abstract: The flood of professional publications, which presents an information crisis of the first order, has now begun to produce a second-order crisis in its evaluation. Most professions are inundated with new literature. As a result, only a few books get reviewed, and those that do are often reviewed poorly. According to a political scientist who recently kept score on reviews of his latest book, the malady has several aspects: (1) Books whose subject matter suit them for review in certain journals are not reviewed in those but in other journals that are much less pertinent to the topic; (2) The assignments of individual reviewers to books is haphazard and results in incompetent reviews; (3) The “non-review” prevails: reviewers peddle their own intellectual wares instead of discussing the contents of the book in question and (4) Outright dishonesty occurs: distortion and misquotation shade off into plagiarism. These are strong assertions whose general applicability may not always hold; however, the issue of reviewer competency and the quality of reviews is worth more detailed consideration.

Date: 1973
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.4.1.20 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:orinte:v:4:y:1973:i:1:p:20-27

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Interfaces from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().