Stepping into Ill-Fitting Shoes: Local Status Contrasts and Acquisitiveness of New CEOs

Rajiv Krishnan Kozhikode () and Rekha Krishnan ()
Additional contact information
Rajiv Krishnan Kozhikode: Beedie School of Business, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
Rekha Krishnan: Beedie School of Business, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada

Strategy Science, 2022, vol. 7, issue 3, 210-239

Abstract: This paper asks what motivates new chief executive officers (CEOs) to engage in an acquisition spree despite the considerable risk it entails to themselves and their firms. Building on status theory and performance feedback theory, we theorized that status distance between new CEOs and their predecessors explains the empire-building behavior of new CEOs early in their tenure. Because of the uncertainty surrounding a CEO’s quality early in the individual’s tenure, status serves as a signal of quality for the new CEO. Hence, CEOs had to rely on status signals to maintain or close the status gap between them and their predecessors. Drawing on performance feedback theory, we theorized that new CEOs’ status contrast relative to their predecessor influences their acquisitive behavior. Our examination of the acquisition behavior of 429 new CEOs of S&P 500 firms in the United States revealed that relatively low-status CEOs engaged in risk-taking to improve their status, but relatively high-status new CEOs engaged in risk-taking to maintain their lead. It also revealed that new CEOs changed their risk-taking behavior when direct evidence of their quality or that of their predecessors deviated from the underlying quality expectations indicated by their relative status position.

Keywords: CEO succession; acquisitiveness; status comparisons; performance feedback; risk-taking (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2021.0150 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:orstsc:v:7:y:2022:i:3:p:210-239

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Strategy Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().