Profiting from Data Commons: Theory, Evidence, and Strategy Implications

Jason Potts (), Andrew Torrance (), Dietmar Harhoff () and Eric von Hippel ()
Additional contact information
Jason Potts: School of Economics, Finance and Marketing RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
Andrew Torrance: School of Law, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045
Dietmar Harhoff: Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munchen, 80539 Bayern, Germany
Eric von Hippel: Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

Strategy Science, 2024, vol. 9, issue 1, 1-17

Abstract: We define data commons as repositories of freely-accessible, “open source” innovation-related data, information and knowledge. Data commons are and can be a significant resource for both innovating and innovation-adopting firms and individuals. First, the availability of free data and information from such commons reduces the innovation-specific private or open investment required to access the data and make the next innovative advance. Second, the fact that the data are freely accessible lowers transactions costs substantially. In this paper, we draw on the theory and empirical evidence regarding innovation commons in general and data commons in particular. Based on these foundations, we consider strategic decisions in the private and public domain: how can individuals, firms and societies profit from data commons? We first discuss the varying nature of and contents of data commons, their functioning, and the value they provide to private innovators and to social welfare. We next explore the several types of data commons extant today, and their mechanisms of action. We find that those who develop innovation-related information at private cost already have, surprisingly often, an economic incentive to freely reveal their information to a data commons. However, we also find and discuss important exceptions. We conclude with suggestions regarding needed innovation research, data commons “engineering”, and innovation policymaking that could together increase private and social welfare via enhancement of data commons.

Keywords: diffusion of innovation; ecosystems; market failures; open innovation; patents; intellectual property; technology strategy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2021.0080 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:orstsc:v:9:y:2024:i:1:p:1-17

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Strategy Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().