Does the option market produce superior forecasts of noise-corrected volatility measures?
Gael Martin,
Andrew Reidy and
Jill Wright
Additional contact information
Andrew Reidy: Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Postal: Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Jill Wright: Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Postal: Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2009, vol. 24, issue 1, 77-104
Abstract:
This paper assesses the robustness of the relative performance of spot- and options-based volatility forecasts to the treatment of microstructure noise. Robustness of the results to the method of constructing option-implied forecasts is also investigated. Using a test for superior predictive ability, model-free implied volatility, which exploits information in the volatility 'smile', and at-the-money implied volatility, which does not, are both tested as benchmark forecasts of a range of alternative volatility proxies. The results provide compelling evidence against the model-free forecast for three Dow Jones Industrial Average stocks, over a 2001-2006 evaluation period. In contrast, the at-the-money implied volatility forecast is given strong support for the three equities over this period. Neither benchmark is supported for the S&P500 index. Importantly, the main qualitative results are invariant to the method of noise correction used in measuring future volatility. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/jae.1033 Link to full text; subscription required (text/html)
http://qed.econ.queensu.ca:80/jae/2009-v24.1/ Supporting data files and programs (text/html)
Related works:
Working Paper: Does the Option Market Produce Superior Forecasts of Noise-Corrected Volatility Measures? (2007) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jae:japmet:v:24:y:2009:i:1:p:77-104
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www3.intersci ... e.jsp?issn=0883-7252
DOI: 10.1002/jae.1033
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Applied Econometrics is currently edited by M. Hashem Pesaran
More articles in Journal of Applied Econometrics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and Christopher F. Baum ().