Microfinance and consumption inequality: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in Andhra Pradesh, India

Jyoti Prasad Mukhopadhyay
Additional contact information
Jyoti Prasad Mukhopadhyay: Institute for Financial Management and Research, India

Journal of Developing Areas, 2016, vol. 50, issue 2, 269-291

Abstract: Existing evaluation studies of microfinance programs typically examine impact of microcredit on its borrowers in terms of certain broad indicators of development such as consumption, income, health, education, livelihoods, etc. Microfinance, a collateral free direct access to group-based credit, leads to financial deepening which has implications for consumption inequality. However, there is dearth of studies that systematically examine the relationship between microfinance and consumption inequality. Existing studies that examine such relationship lack methodological rigor. This paper fills this particular void in the literature. We examine the impact of access to microfinance on consumption inequality using a household-level panel dataset. The impact is analyzed in two ways viz. within slums and within treatment group. We compute standard measures of inequality such as coefficient of variation (CV), Gini coefficient, and Theil index and use regression technique to estimate the impact of microcredit on consumption inequality. We further test robustness of our results using bootstrap, a non-parametric technique used extensively in applied research. An inequality decomposition analysis following Shorrock’s (1982) method is also conducted. The data is taken from three rounds of household surveys viz. baseline and two follow-up surveys conducted by Banerjee et al. (2013) as part of the randomized evaluation of microcredit programs carried out in 104 slums in Andhra Pradesh, India. We find that access to microcredit exacerbates consumption inequality both within slums and within experiment groups. A follow-up decomposition of inequality indices shows that this difference in consumption inequality is predominantly driven by expenditure on non-food items. However, once all households across treatment and control slums have equal access to microcredit in the long-run, the disparity in consumption inequality between treatment and control slums dissipates. Our results suggest that larger loan size and number of loan cycles do not matter for consumption inequality across treatment and control households. These results also suggest need for targeted livelihood support programs for those who cannot participate in microcredit programs.

Keywords: microfinance; randomized controlled trial; inequality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C23 D63 G21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://muse.jhu.edu/article/621346

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue2:pp:269-291

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Developing Areas from Tennessee State University, College of Business Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Abu N.M. Wahid ().