EFFECT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ON CEO PAY - RISK TAKING ASSOCIATION: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM AUSTRALIAN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

Abdullahi Ahmed and Gilbert A. Ndayisaba
Additional contact information
Gilbert A. Ndayisaba: RMIT University, Australia

Journal of Developing Areas, 2016, vol. 50, issue 4, 309-344

Abstract: This study explores the impact of board structures on risk taking-CEO pay association in Australian financial institutions. Using a panel data of 45 listed Australian financial institutions for the period 2004-2015, we examine the empirical relationship between firms expected default probability and CEO pay. Our results show that deposit taking institutions with a greater number of nonexecutive directors on the board generally have an expected default probability (EDP) that is more sensitive to CEO short-term employee benefits. However, a lower response of EDP to changes in CEO short-term employee benefits in non-deposit taking institutions is observed. To a large extent, this phenomenon is explained by the existence of moral hazard problem in banking industry. As depositors are insured against losses, nonexecutive directors may fail to monitor executives taking on risky investments that generate short-term gains in order to boost their cash bonus and other short-term risk remuneration. Our results suggest that boards associated with more nonexecutive directors’ increase (reduce) the responsiveness of expected default probability to changes in CEO short-term employee benefits (long-term variable remuneration pay). We observe that Australian financial institutions with large boards are linked to EDP which is sensitive to both CEO short-term and long-term remuneration incentives. Institutions with larger boards motivate their CEOs to invest in high risk financial assets, consequently escalating the level of CEO risk-taking. Finally, independence of the board members plays a critical role in reducing the level of CEO risk-taking only if CEO remuneration is largely made of long-term incentives remuneration such as options and share restricted payments. In line with other studies from US, boards should use long-term incentives in CEO remuneration to reduce agency costs and increase firm value.

Keywords: Firm Value; CEO Pay; Corporate Governance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G18 G24 G30 G38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://muse.jhu.edu/article/639401

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jda:journl:vol.50:year:2016:issue4:pp:307-341

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Developing Areas from Tennessee State University, College of Business Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Abu N.M. Wahid ().