Numerosity and allocation behavior: Insights using the dictator game
Gary J. Gaeth and
Irwin P Levin
Judgment and Decision Making, 2017, vol. 12, issue 6, 527-536
This paper investigates how the numerosity bias influences individualsâ€™ allocation of resources between themselves and others, using the backdrop of the traditional dictator game. Across four studies including both hypothetical and real exchanges of money, we show that the form of the numerical value representing the quantity of the resource (e.g., $20 vs 2000 cents) systematically biases the decision-maker to perceive the quantity s/he is thinking of allocating as being ``less than adequate'' or ``more than adequate''. Essentially, such a biased perception of adequacy with respect to the quantity of the resource consequently influences the decision-makerâ€™s final allocation decision. We attribute this systematic bias to the ``numerosity'' of the resource. We find that bigger numerical values representing quantity (e.g., 2000 cents) bias decision-makers to over-infer the quantity, thus inducing them to allocate less to the entities they are focusing on.
Keywords: numerosity; framing; dictator game; allocation; behavior; resource allocation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jdm:journl:v:12:y:2017:i:6:p:527-536
Access Statistics for this article
Judgment and Decision Making is currently edited by Jonathan Baron
More articles in Judgment and Decision Making from Society for Judgment and Decision Making
Series data maintained by Jonathan Baron ().