Veil-of-ignorance reasoning mitigates self-serving bias in resource allocation during the COVID-19 crisis
Regan M. Bernhard,
Max Bazerman and
Joshua D. Greene
Judgment and Decision Making, 2021, vol. 16, issue 1, 1-19
The COVID-19 crisis has forced healthcare professionals to make tragic decisions concerning which patients to save. Furthermore, The COVID-19 crisis has foregrounded the influence of self-serving bias in debates on how to allocate scarce resources. A utilitarian principle favors allocating scarce resources such as ventilators toward younger patients, as this is expected to save more years of life. Some view this as ageist, instead favoring age-neutral principles, such as â€œfirst come, first servedâ€ . Which approach is fairer? The â€œveil of ignoranceâ€ is a moral reasoning device designed to promote impartial decision-making by reducing decision-makersâ€™ use of potentially biasing information about who will benefit most or least from the available options. Veil-of-ignorance reasoning was originally applied by philosophers and economists to foundational questions concerning the overall organization of society. Here we apply veil-of-ignorance reasoning to the COVID-19 ventilator dilemma, asking participants which policy they would prefer if they did not know whether they were younger or older. Two studies (pre-registered; online samples; Study 1, N=414; Study 2 replication, N=1,276) show that veil-of-ignorance reasoning shifts preferences toward saving younger patients. The effect on older participants is dramatic, reversing their opposition toward favoring the young, thereby eliminating self-serving bias. These findings provide guidance on how to remove self-serving biases to healthcare policymakers and frontline personnel charged with allocating scarce medical resources during times of crisis.
Keywords: fairness; self-serving bias; procedural justice; bioethics; COVID-19 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jdm:journl:v:16:y:2021:i:1:p:1-19
Access Statistics for this article
Judgment and Decision Making is currently edited by Jonathan Baron, Mandeep Dhami, Andreas GlÃ¶ckner
More articles in Judgment and Decision Making from Society for Judgment and Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jonathan Baron ().