EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

THE REPRESENTATIVENESS OF HOMO OECONOMICUS AND ITS RATIONALITY

Paula Diacon ()
Additional contact information
Paula Diacon: Doctoral School of Economics and Business Administration within Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania

CES Working Papers, 2014, vol. 6(3), issue 3, 29-35

Abstract: The homo oeconomicus model is an essential concept of the neoclassical analysis. It defines the agent capable of rational choices in pursuing the maximization of his own utility functions. Over time, the notion remained at the basis of many debates, related mainly to its relevance. However, the concept remained, until now, a fundamental component of mainstream analysis. This article aims to present a brief overview of the arguments that support the use of this model, but also its limitations and inconsistencies. Our main goal is to analyze if homo oeconomicus can be or not considered an ideal representation of the economic agent. Further, the analysis emphasize on the attribute of rationality, which is one of the most disputed feature in the literature.

Keywords: homo oeconomicus; mainstream economics; economic behaviour; rationality (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D01 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://ceswp.uaic.ro/articles/CESWP2014_VI3_DIA.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jes:wpaper:y:2014:v:6:i:3:p:29-35

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in CES Working Papers from Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alupului Ciprian ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:jes:wpaper:y:2014:v:6:i:3:p:29-35