EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Study on Evaluation of Asset Quality in EnterprisesBased on DEA Model

Xiaoying Chen

International Journal of Business Administration, 2011, vol. 2, issue 2, 35-40

Abstract: The quantity of assets, especially the quality of assets, plays a crucial role in development of enterprises. For the time being, most studies about asset quality of enterprises are limited to qualitative analysis and there are rarely studies of quantitative evaluation. DEA analysis method is one which studies whether a multiple element input and multiple output system is relatively effective. We may regard an enterprise as a system with input of asset element and output of quality benefit. This article employed a quantitative method to discuss asset quality evaluation based on DEA Model by irrationally selecting asset element input indexes and quality benefit output indexes. Then, the author analyzed applicability and merits as well as disadvantages of this method.

Keywords: DEA Model; Asset quality; Effectiveness of scale; Effectiveness of technique (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijba/article/view/230/119 (application/pdf)
http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijba/article/view/230 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jfr:ijba11:v:2:y:2011:i:2:p:35-40

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Business Administration is currently edited by Jenny Zhang

More articles in International Journal of Business Administration from International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jenny Zhang ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijba11:v:2:y:2011:i:2:p:35-40