EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Is Risk Based Capital Ratio a True Measure of the Soundness of Banks? Evidence From India

J. Navas, P. Dhanavanthan and D. Lazar

International Journal of Financial Research, 2021, vol. 12, issue 3, 92-102

Abstract: The capital to risk-weighted assets ratio (CRAR) introduced by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) of the Bank for International Settlement (BIS) is widely used as an important measure of the soundness of banks. However, international institutions, academics, and market analytics have increasingly questioned the reliability of the ratio which has been revised a number of times since its inception, to make it more robust. The main objective of the present study is to assess the adequacy of using CRAR as a measure of the soundness of banks. One of the most popular methods used for the analysis of the banks¡¯ financial soundness is CAMELS framework which uses six key dimensions: capital adequacy, asset quality, management quality, earning ability, liquidity, and sensitivity to market risk. Before the introduction of CRAR, the ratio of capital to the total assets was widely used as a measure of capital adequacy in the CAMELS framework. However, when risk-based CRAR was introduced, banking regulators and policymakers started using it in the CAMELS framework for representing capital adequacy. In this paper, we argue that CRAR, as a comprehensive forward-looking measure, encapsulates all the six dimensions of the financial soundness of banks, representing various facets of banking operations, which are covered in the CAMELS framework. We, therefore, develop a theoretical framework to establish the relationship between risk-based CRAR and the important ratios used under the CAMELS framework and then empirically investigate the relationship using a panel regression model using data of Indian banks for the period 2009¨C2018. The results indicate that CRAR has a significant and theoretically consistent relationship with all six dimensions of the CAMEL framework. The study, therefore, does not only confirm the appropriateness of using CRAR as a measure of the soundness of banks, but also opens up a debate on whether CRAR can be an alternative for the CAMELS framework.

Keywords: capital adequacy; financial soundness; camels model; banking regulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijfr/article/view/19895/12204 (application/pdf)
http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijfr/article/view/19895 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jfr:ijfr11:v:12:y:2021:i:3:p:92-102

DOI: 10.5430/ijfr.v12n3p92

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Financial Research is currently edited by Gina Perry

More articles in International Journal of Financial Research from International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Gina Perry ().

 
Page updated 2021-06-26
Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijfr11:v:12:y:2021:i:3:p:92-102