The Effect of Changing the Listing Level on the Information Environment of ADRs

Candice L. Deal

International Journal of Financial Research, 2016, vol. 7, issue 4, 208-241

Abstract: This study investigates the impact of changing the listing level of American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) on the information environment of ADRs. Specifically I examine four main listing levels of ADRs and analyze whether ADRs that change (upgrade/downgrade) their listing level have greater/less analyst coverage, increased/decreased forecast accuracy, and increased/decreased forecast dispersion. In addition, since analyst forecast accuracy differs depending on ADRs¡¯ home country legal institutions, this study also investigates whether analyst forecast accuracy differs depending on ADRs¡¯ home country legal institutions. Specifically, I examine whether the impact on information environment is different for ADRs from countries with different legal systems and disclosure regulations. The SEC has segmented ADRs into four listing levels which have different reporting and regulatory requirements. The SEC and disclosure requirements vary across the four ADR programs. Level II and Level III are exchange listed ADRs, Level I is traded OTC, and Level IV private placement. ADRs that trade in the U.S. market (exchange listed) have more stringent requirements and must adhere to stronger enforcement of accounting standards. Thus, their regulatory and hence quality of information environment is higher. If ADRs that trade on Level II and Level III must follow a more rigorous regulatory requirement, then do analysts and investors in the U.S. markets adjust the pricing of securities to reflect this difference in ADR listing levels? The sample consists of 448 ADR firms from emerging and developed markets around the world that cross-listed on U.S. markets and eventually changed their listing level between 1999 and 2010. I classify the firms based on their listing level which symbolizes the degree of regulatory adherence. To proxy for the information environment, I examine analyst forecast. I analyze the level of significant difference in forecast accuracy, number of analyst forecast, and forecast dispersion when ADRs change their listing level. I present empirical evidence consistent with the hypotheses that an upgrade (downgrade) of ADR listing level is associated with a decrease (increase) in analysts¡¯ forecast error, and number of analyst following. These results indicate that a change in the information environment around U.S. cross-listing is a combination of both the bonding hypothesis effect and the ADR listing level effect.

Keywords: analyst forecast; ADRs; forecast dispersion; information environment; cross-listing; shareholder protection (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijfr/article/view/9922/6042 (application/pdf)
http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijfr/article/view/9922 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jfr:ijfr11:v:7:y:2016:i:4:p:208-241

DOI: 10.5430/ijfr.v7n4p208

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Financial Research is currently edited by Gina Perry

More articles in International Journal of Financial Research from International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Gina Perry ().