EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

How to Manage Issues Relating to the Use of Trial Experts: Standards for the Introduction of Expert Testimony through Judicial ¡°Gate-Keeping¡± and Scientific Verification

Richard J. Hunter, Jr., John H. Shannon and Henry J. Amoroso

Journal of Management and Strategy, 2018, vol. 9, issue 1, 1-11

Abstract: This paper considers issues relating to the introduction of expert testimony in both civil and criminal cases in the American legal system. The paper reviews the Daubert Rule and the standards governing the admissibility of expert testimony in relation to the requirements of peer review and the use of a recognized ¡°scientific method.¡± A number of federal cases will be considered which have attempted to refine and apply the Daubert Rule in a variety of factual circumstances where expert witnesses have been called on to offer their testimony and opinions at various stages of the legal process.

Keywords: expert testimony; Daubert Rule; Federal Rules of Evidence; junk science; peer review (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/jms/article/view/12850/7955 (application/pdf)
http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/jms/article/view/12850 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jfr:jms111:v:9:y:2018:i:1:p:1-11

DOI: 10.5430/jms.v9n1p1

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Management and Strategy is currently edited by Jenny Zhang

More articles in Journal of Management and Strategy from Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jenny Zhang ().

 
Page updated 2022-03-27
Handle: RePEc:jfr:jms111:v:9:y:2018:i:1:p:1-11