Government Size and Trade Openness: Some Additional Insights

Paolo Liberati

Research in World Economy, 2013, vol. 4, issue 2, 12-17

Abstract: This paper provides additional insights on the relationship between government size and trade openness using a panel of countries drawn from the World Development Indicators and the Penn World Tables 7.0 from 1962 to 2009. It is shown that the compensation hypothesis proposed by Rodrik (1998) and revisited by Alesina and Wacziarg (1998) and by Ram (2009) cannot be attributed general validity. On the one hand, it is shown that country size is not relevant to determine the sign of the relationship between government size and economic openness, contradicting previous results by Alesina and Wacziarg (1998). On the other hand, the relevance of the cross-country heterogeneity suggested by Ram (2009) to argue in favour of the compensation hypothesis only picks the characteristic of the African countries of being relatively more closed.

Keywords: openness; government size; compensation hypothesis; government consumption; trade (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/rwe/article/view/2995/1773 (application/pdf)
http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/rwe/article/view/2995 (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: Government Size and Trade Openness: Some Additional Insights (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jfr:rwe111:v:4:y:2013:i:2:p:12-17

Access Statistics for this article

Research in World Economy is currently edited by Gina Perry

More articles in Research in World Economy from Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Gina Perry ().