Students' Preferences of Oral Corrective Feedback: Traditional vs. Online Learning

Eman Matar M. Alshammari and Thamir Issa Alomaim

World Journal of English Language, 2025, vol. 15, issue 6, 77

Abstract: Previous studies explored teachers' perceptions regarding different types of oral corrective feedback (OCF) (see e.g. Alshammari & Wicaksono, 2022). They found some similarities and dissimilarities between instructors' views and their actual choices and practices regarding OCF, with one of the key findings being that recast was the most commonly used, mainly because teachers considered it very effective for their learners' education (Alshammari & Wicaksono, 2022). This was not in line with most previous research, which found that recast was the predominant oral correction form employed, even though it was considered the least effective. It was mainly used to keep the smoothness of interaction or to prevent the arousal of negative feelings. However, there is a lack of studies investigating learners' preferences regarding OCF. Therefore, the current research examines learners' attitudes towards various oral correction strategies, considering the possible influence of multiple variables such as the context, and specifically comparing online vs. traditional learning English language classes.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/27741/16990 (application/pdf)
https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/27741 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:15:y:2025:i:6:p:77

Access Statistics for this article

World Journal of English Language is currently edited by Joe Nelson

More articles in World Journal of English Language from Sciedu Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sciedu Press ().