The Interpretation of Interpersonal Utility Comparisons: Positive, Normative and Descriptive

John Davis

Journal of Income Distribution, 1992, vol. 01, issue 1, 3-3

Abstract: While interpersonal utility comparisons are indispensable to the determination of utility maxima, their interpretation as either normative or positive produces awkward conclusions. This paper alternatively reinterprets interpersonal utility comparisons as descriptive and value-laden rather than as either normative or positive. On this basis they are characterized as functional concepts, and are thus argued to be objective. This treatment suggests that it is possible to derive evaluative statements from descriptive ones, contrary to the usual view of the is-ought problem. Recent philosophy of the language results are employed to support these views.

Date: 1992
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://jid.journals.yorku.ca/index.php/jid/article/view/753 (application/pdf)
Some fulltext downloads are only available to subscribers. See JID website for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jid:journl:y:1992:v:01:i:1:p:3-3

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Income Distribution from Ad libros publications inc. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Timm Boenke ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).