Family Equivalence Scales within a Narrow and Broad Welfare Context
Erik Plug () and
Bernard van Praag ()
Journal of Income Distribution, 1995, vol. 04, issue 2, 1-1
Family size affects welfare in two ways. First, if family increases and income is constant, income has to be spread over more family members. This would suggest that a family increase would yield a welfare decrease. However, the fact that families have children, even if technically avoidable, points to a value of children as consumption goods. In this paper we analyze two attitude questions, viz. the Income Evaluation Question and the Cantril Question. The first may be interpreted as capturing the first effect only, while the second captures both. We derive family equivalence scales based on the two questions and we find quite different scales. Furthermore we show that both scales do not satisfy the IB-property.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Some fulltext downloads are only available to subscribers. See JID website for details.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jid:journl:y:1995:v:04:i:2:p:1-1
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Income Distribution from Ad libros publications inc. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Timm Boenke ().