Impact of Apiculture on the Household Income of Rural Poor in Mountains of Chitral District in Pakistan

Tariq Ahmad, Ghulam-Muhammad Shah, Farid Ahmad, Uma Partap and Sajjad Ahmad
Additional contact information
Tariq Ahmad: International Center for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD)

Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), 2017, vol. 6, issue 3, 518-531

Abstract: Livelihoods of communities living in mountain areas is typically dependent on subsistence agriculture and smallholder farming. The needs of smallholder rural mountain farmers for livelihoods cannot be addressed without providing them alternative income within available resources. Beekeeping has proven to be such an alternative livelihood option with potential of providing alternative income security to smallholder farmers living in rural mountain areas.However, how successful and sustainable beekeeping interventions are in terms of presenting a reliable alternative livelihood option particularly in rural mountain context of Pakistan is less explored. In this context, an impact assessment approach has been used in an ex-post scenario to better understand impacts attributable to an intervention.Applying such approaches in ex-post scenarios help better understand relevance, effectiveness, and suitability and sustainability aspects of interventions. This paper assesses impact of beekeeping pilot intervention on the household income of rural poor living in mountain areas of Pakistan and looks into suitability and sustainability aspects of the intervention in the ex-post scenario. Using ‘Difference-in-Difference’ approach, impact and sustainability of pilot intervention was assessed 4 years after conclusionof the intervention. Findings of the study suggest that average income of beneficiary households from beekeeping is increased by51.54% compared to the average income of beneficiary households assessed at the end of the pilot intervention. Study concludes that interventions on strengthening alternative income security optionsin rural mountain context are sustainable given that the alternative livelihood options are carefully identified and implemented in a participatory manner.

Keywords: Pilot intervention, alternative income, alternative livelihoods, impact assessment, ex-post scenario, difference-in-difference, rural mountain context, up-scaling JEL Classification Code: D10; D14; D60; I30 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://centreofexcellence.net/J/JSS/Vol6/No3/JSSarticle7,6_3_pp518-531.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jso:coejss:v:6:y:2017:i:3:p:518-531

DOI: 10.25255/jss.2017.6.3.518.531

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS) is currently edited by Nasir Ali Shamsi (Editor-in-Chief) and Dr.Neda Khan

More articles in Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by COES&RJ LLC. Maintainer-Workplace-Name: Centre of Excellence for Scientific & Research Journalism - COES&RJ LLC Maintainer-Address: 10685-B Hazelhurst Dr., Houston, TX 77043, USA () and ().