Model uncertainty on commodity portfolios, the role of convenience yield

Junhe Chen () and Marcos Escobar-Anel ()
Additional contact information
Junhe Chen: Western University
Marcos Escobar-Anel: Western University
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Marcos Escobar Anel ()

Annals of Finance, 2021, vol. 17, issue 4, No 3, 528 pages

Abstract: Abstract This paper investigates the effect of model uncertainty on the performance of commodity-based portfolios. We consider a constant relative risk aversion (CRRA) utility maximizer investor in a complete market, with independent ambiguity-aversion levels for the three factors explaining the term structure of future prices, namely, spot prices, convenience yield (CY) and interest rates (IRs), as proposed in the seminal work of Schwartz (J Finance 52(3): 923–973, 1997). This generic investor is interested in the speculative component of the investment rather than possessing/consuming the physical commodity. We obtain closed-form solutions for optimal investments, optimal perturbations (alternative model) and value functions in line with the robust portfolio setting of Maenhout (Rev Financial Stud 17(4): 951–983, 2004). Our main focus is on the effect of convenience yield’s uncertainty on the optimal analysis. We estimate the model by applying a combination of maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and Kalman Filter (KF) techniques, to two commodities: West Texas Intermediate (WTI) and copper future prices. The analysis demonstrates that uncertainty on the CY factor could be the largest contributor to the under-performance of a commodities portfolio, with wealth equivalent losses (WELs) in the ranges of 33% to 88% (WTI), and 7% to 31% (copper). Moreover, small variations, of up 25%, on CY’s covariance parameters could lead to a WEL of up to 40% (WTI, lesser volatility of CY).

Keywords: Multivariate portfolio choice; Ambiguity aversion; Commodity markets; Welfare-equivalent losses (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C61 G11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10436-021-00393-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:annfin:v:17:y:2021:i:4:d:10.1007_s10436-021-00393-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/finance/journal/10436/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10436-021-00393-5

Access Statistics for this article

Annals of Finance is currently edited by Anne Villamil

More articles in Annals of Finance from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().