EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Rational pricing of leveraged ETF expense ratios

Alex Garivaltis ()
Additional contact information
Alex Garivaltis: Northern Illinois University

Annals of Finance, 2022, vol. 18, issue 3, No 4, 393-418

Abstract: Abstract This paper studies the general relationship between the gearing ratio of a Leveraged ETF and its corresponding expense ratio, viz., the investment management fees that are charged for the provision of this levered financial service. It must not be possible for an investor to combine two or more LETFs in such a way that his (continuously-rebalanced) LETF portfolio can match the gearing ratio of a given, professionally managed product and, at the same time, enjoy lower weighted-average expenses than the existing LETF. Given a finite set of LETFs that exist in the marketplace, I give necessary and sufficient conditions for these products to be undominated in the price-gearing plane. In an application of the duality theorem of linear programming, I prove a kind of two-fund theorem for LETFs: given a target gearing ratio for the investor, the cheapest way to achieve it is to combine (uniquely) the two nearest undominated LETF products that bracket it on the leverage axis. This also happens to be the implementation with the lowest annual turnover. For completeness, we supply a second proof of the Main Theorem on LETFs that is based on Carathéodory’s theorem in convex geometry. Thus, say, a triple-leveraged (“UltraPro”) exchange-traded product should never be mixed with cash, if the investor is able to trade in the underlying index. In terms of financial innovation, our two-fund theorem for LETFs implies that the introduction of new, undominated 2.5 $$\times $$ × products would increase the welfare of all investors whose preferred gearing ratios lie between 2 $$\times $$ × (“Ultra”) and 3 $$\times $$ × (“UltraPro”). Similarly for a 1.5x product.

Keywords: Leveraged ETFs; Margin loans; Expense ratios; Investment management; Cost of leverage; Volatility decay (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C44 D24 D81 G11 G23 G51 G53 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10436-022-00408-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:annfin:v:18:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10436-022-00408-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/finance/journal/10436/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10436-022-00408-9

Access Statistics for this article

Annals of Finance is currently edited by Anne Villamil

More articles in Annals of Finance from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:kap:annfin:v:18:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10436-022-00408-9