How Asymmetrically Increasing Joint Strike Costs Need Not Lead to Fewer Strikes
Archontis L. Pantsios () and
Additional contact information
Archontis L. Pantsios: Liverpool Hope University
Atlantic Economic Journal, 2017, vol. 45, issue 2, 149-161
Abstract The joint costs model states that increasing union and firm strike costs lead to fewer strikes. This paper shows that strike incidence need not decrease when joint strike costs increase. The innovation is to raise union and firm joint strike costs in an asymmetric way. The results indicate that increasing either party’s strike costs can have ambiguous effects on strike incidence. This ambiguity explains why higher strike costs need not always lead to fewer strikes, and thus accounts for the mixed success observed in studies that empirically test the joint costs model with strike incidence data.
Keywords: Strike activity; Joint strike costs; Game of chicken; J51; J52; C72; C78 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11293-017-9539-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Working Paper: How Asymmetrically Increasing Joint Strike Costs Need Not Lead to Fewer Strikes (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:atlecj:v:45:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s11293-017-9539-5
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/11293/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Atlantic Economic Journal is currently edited by Kathleen S. Virgo
More articles in Atlantic Economic Journal from Springer, International Atlantic Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Sonal Shukla ().