EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Evolutionary Frequency and Forecasting Accuracy: Simulations Based on an Agent-Based Artificial Stock Market

Ya-Chi Huang () and Chueh-Yung Tsao ()
Additional contact information
Ya-Chi Huang: Lunghwa University of Science and Technology
Chueh-Yung Tsao: Chang Gung University

Computational Economics, 2018, vol. 52, issue 1, 79-104

Abstract: Abstract Learning how to forecast is always important for traders, and divergent learning frequencies prevail among traders. The influence of the evolutionary frequency on learning performance has occasioned many studies of agent-based computational finance (e.g., Lettau in J Econ Dyn Control 21:1117–1147, 1997. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1889(97)00046-8 ; Szpiro in Complexity 2(4):31–39, 1997. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0526(199703/04)2:4 3.0.CO;2-3 ; Cacho and Simmons in Aust J Agric Resour Econ 43(3):305–322, 1999. doi: 10.1111/1467-8489.00081 ). Although these studies all suggest that evolving less frequently and, hence, experiencing more realizations help learning, this implication may result from their common stationary assumption. Therefore, we first attempt to approach this issue in a ‘dynamically’ evolving market in which agents learn to forecast endogenously generated asset prices. Moreover, in these studies’ market settings, evolving less frequently also meant having a longer time horizon. However, it is not true in many market settings that are even closer to the real financial markets. The clarification that the evolutionary frequency and the time horizon are two separate notions leaves the effect of the evolutionary frequency on learning even more elusive and worthy of exploration independently. We find that the influence of a trader’s evolutionary frequency on his forecasting accuracy depends on all market participants and the resulting price dynamics. In addition, prior studies also commonly assume that traders have identical preferences, which is too strong an assumption to apply to a real market. Considering the heterogeneity of preferences, we find that converging to the rational expectations equilibrium is hardly possible, and we even suggest that agents in a slow-learning market learn frequently. We also apply a series of econometric tests to explain the simulation results.

Keywords: Genetic algorithms; Forecasting accuracy; Stationary; Evolutionary frequency; Agent-based artificial stock markets (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10614-017-9662-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:compec:v:52:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10614-017-9662-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ry/journal/10614/PS2

Access Statistics for this article

Computational Economics is currently edited by Hans Amman

More articles in Computational Economics from Springer, Society for Computational Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().

 
Page updated 2019-05-15
Handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:52:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10614-017-9662-z