Dynamic preferences and the behavioral case against sin taxes
Charles Delmotte () and
Additional contact information
Charles Delmotte: New York University Law School
Malte Dold: Pomona College
Constitutional Political Economy, 2022, vol. 33, issue 1, No 5, 80-99
Abstract Traditionally, economists and tax theorists justify taxation by means of externalities. In recent years, both scholars and policymakers have begun advocating ‘sin taxes’ on goods whose consumption causes ‘internalities’: unaccounted-for costs that a person imposes on herself, not on others. In this paper, we argue that sin taxes rest on a static model of individual choice. They retain neoclassical rationality—with its endorsement of stable and context-independent preferences—as a normative benchmark for good, i.e., welfare-increasing choice. We contrast this model with a more dynamic understanding of choice in which preferences are context-dependent, evolving, and open to individual processes of experimentation. Such a dynamic understanding of choice is backed by recent findings in psychology and behavioral economics and is integral to the political economy of John Stuart Mill. Contributing to the most recent literature in behavioral welfare economics, we argue that the reality of dynamic and evolving preferences animates a contractarian perspective on public policy which, in turn, provides strong arguments against the sin-tax agenda and supports preference-neutral tax rules.
Keywords: Sin Taxes; Behavioral Economics; Contractarianism; Dynamic Preferences; John Stuart Mill; Self-Governance; D63; D91; H20; I31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10602-021-09328-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:copoec:v:33:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10602-021-09328-8
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ce/journal/10602/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Constitutional Political Economy is currently edited by Roger Congleton and Stefan Voigt
More articles in Constitutional Political Economy from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().