The case for the five in final five voting
Katherine Gehl ()
Additional contact information
Katherine Gehl: Institute for Political Innovation
Constitutional Political Economy, 2023, vol. 34, issue 3, No 2, 286-296
Abstract:
Abstract My central concern is not, which electoral system would elect the best winner, but rather: which electoral system would be most likely to elect a Congress that would deliver optimal democratic outcomes? I use a theory of politics as an industry, first presented in Gehl & Porter (2017), that analyzes incentives and behaviors through the lens of competition. I argue that the optimal system is Final Five Voting (FFV), which is the combination of an open top-five primary and instant runoff voting (IRV) in the general election. Open, non-partisan primaries that select two candidates exist in California and Washington, while Alaska elects four in its open primary. Here I explain why the optimal number of candidates to advance from the primary to the general election is five.
Keywords: Final Five Voting; Political system; Partisan gridlock; Election reform; Political innovation; Political parties; Healthy competition; Party primary; Instant Runoff Voting; Plurality Voting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D71 D72 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10602-022-09386-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:copoec:v:34:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10602-022-09386-6
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ce/journal/10602/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s10602-022-09386-6
Access Statistics for this article
Constitutional Political Economy is currently edited by Roger Congleton and Stefan Voigt
More articles in Constitutional Political Economy from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().