EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Wealth distribution and accounting for changes in wealth inequality: empirical evidence from India, 1991–2012

Aswini Mishra and Vedant Bhardwaj ()
Additional contact information
Vedant Bhardwaj: BITS Pilani, K K Birla Goa Campus

Economic Change and Restructuring, 2021, vol. 54, issue 2, No 10, 585-620

Abstract: Abstract Despite its fast rise on the world stage and rapid economic growth, there has been a dramatic increase in wealth inequality in India in recent years. Nonetheless, the issue of wealth inequality and wealth distribution in India has been relatively less explored. In this context, we use an extension of Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition method based on the recentered influence function (RIF) proposed by Firpo et al. (Econometrics 6(2):28, https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics6020028 , 2018) to analyze the role of household characteristics such as location, household’s composition by age, social groups, as well as education or employment on various wealth distributional measures during the period 1991–2012. We examine the effect of changing distribution of different household characteristics on wealth at various distributional measures (like ventile, Gini index, and variance). In our analysis, we observe the effect of household characteristics on wealth at different ventiles. Using counterfactual distribution analysis, we decomposed the inter-period difference in inequality into characteristics (explained) and coefficients (unexplained) effects. We then decompose changes in wealth at each ventile, Gini index, the variance of log of wealth, 90–10 percentile wealth gap, 50–10 wealth gap, and 90–50 wealth gap during 1991–2002 and 2002–2012 to see the composition effect and wealth structure effect. The composition effect shows the effect of change in the considered household characteristics, whereas the wealth structure effect shows the effect of change in returns to these characteristics. We noticed that during 1991–2002, wealth at lower quantile has decreased whereas it has increased for other quantiles, whereas during 2002–2012, we observe that wealth increase is highest at lower quantiles and is positive for all ventiles. In the case of inequality measures, we observe that all inequality measures have increased during 1991–2002, whereas during 2002–2012, only Gini and 90–50 gap has increased while other measures have decreased.

Keywords: Wealth inequality; Recentered influence function; Decomposition; India (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D31 D63 E01 E21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10644-020-09290-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:ecopln:v:54:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10644-020-09290-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... nt/journal/10644/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10644-020-09290-9

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Change and Restructuring is currently edited by George Hondroyiannis

More articles in Economic Change and Restructuring from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:kap:ecopln:v:54:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s10644-020-09290-9