Third-party funding in a sequential litigation process
Julia Shamir () and
Noam Shamir ()
Additional contact information
Julia Shamir: Tel Aviv University
Noam Shamir: Tel Aviv University
European Journal of Law and Economics, 2021, vol. 52, issue 1, No 6, 169-202
Abstract:
Abstract Third party litigation financing (TPF)—for-profit, nonrecourse funding of litigation by a nonparty—is a new and rapidly developing industry. As a novel phenomenon that involves various normative concerns, TPF has sparked much debate and controversy among scholars and policy-makers, speculating about its potential effects on issues such as the volume of litigation and the quality of claims filed. We develop a game-theoretic model that compares a litigation process with TPF and a “traditional” scheme in which litigation is self-funded. Under the TPF scheme, we decompose the litigation decisions into two parts: the plaintiff is in charge of the legal decisions, while the TPF has the freedom to decide in each stage of the litigation process whether to continue the financial support in the litigation process. Such a setting is characterized by a high level of uncertainty and a degree of asymmetric information between the plaintiff and the TPF. We argue that the divergent interests of the parties to the financing agreement can be aligned by constructing a viable contract that results in the same equilibrium outcome as litigation with no TPF. The contract that achieves these desired results has a few interesting properties. First, it provides a pre-specified remedy to the plaintiff if the TPF funder terminates the financing prior to the conclusion of the litigation process. Second, the contract also specifies the compensation to the TPF funder, which is due upon completion of the litigation process, and it is conditioned upon the awarded verdict.
Keywords: Third party funding; Litigation funding; Game theory; Contract theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K20 K41 L84 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10657-021-09707-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:52:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10657-021-09707-4
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10657
DOI: 10.1007/s10657-021-09707-4
Access Statistics for this article
European Journal of Law and Economics is currently edited by Jürgen Georg Backhaus, Giovanni B. Ramello and Alain Marciano
More articles in European Journal of Law and Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().