Polynomial goal programming and the implicit higher moment preferences of US institutional investors in hedge funds

Juliane Proelss () and Denis Schweizer ()

Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 2014, vol. 28, issue 1, 28 pages

Abstract: Polynomial goal programming (PGP) is a flexible method that allows investor preferences for different moments of the return distribution of financial assets to be included in the portfolio optimization. The method is intuitive and particularly suitable for incorporating investor preferences in higher moments of the return distribution. However, until now, PGP has not been able to meet its full potential because it requires quantification of “real” preference parameters towards those moments. To date, the chosen preference parameters have been selected somewhat “arbitrarily”. Our goal is to calculate implied sets of preference parameters using investors’ choices of and the importance they attribute to risk and performance measures. We use three groups of institutional investors—pension funds, insurance companies, and endowments—and derive implied sets of preference parameters in the context of a hedge fund portfolio optimization. To determine “real” preferences for the higher moments of the portfolio return distribution, we first fit implied preference parameters so that the PGP optimal portfolio is identical to the desired hedge fund portfolio. With the obtained economically justified sets of preference parameters, the well-established PGP framework can be employed more efficiently to derive allocations that satisfy institutional investor expectations for hedge fund investments. Furthermore, the implied preference parameters enable fund of hedge fund managers and other investment managers to derive optimal portfolio allocations based on specific investor expectations. Moreover, the importance of individual moments, as well as their marginal rates of substitution, can be assessed. Copyright Swiss Society for Financial Market Research 2014

Keywords: Polynomial goal programming; Fund of hedge funds; Higher moments; Investor preferences; G11; G23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11408-013-0221-x (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:fmktpm:v:28:y:2014:i:1:p:1-28

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... nt/journal/11408/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11408-013-0221-x

Access Statistics for this article

Financial Markets and Portfolio Management is currently edited by Manuel Ammann

More articles in Financial Markets and Portfolio Management from Springer, Swiss Society for Financial Market Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().