EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

New methods in the classical economics of uncertainty: comparing risks

Christian Gollier () and Miles Kimball

The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 2018, vol. 43, issue 1, 5-23

Abstract: Abstract Second-order stochastic dominance answers the question “Under what conditions will all risk-averse agents prefer $$\tilde{x}_2$$ x ~ 2 to $$\tilde{x}_1$$ x ~ 1 ?” Consider the following related question: “Under what conditions will all risk-averse agents who prefer lottery $$\tilde{x}_1$$ x ~ 1 to a reference lottery $$\tilde{\omega }$$ ω ~ also prefer lottery $$\tilde{x}_2$$ x ~ 2 to that reference lottery?” Each of these two questions is an example of a broad category of questions of great relevance for the economics of risk. The second question is an example of a contingent risk comparison, while the question behind second-order stochastic dominance is an example of a non-contingent risk comparison. The stochastic order arising from a contingent risk comparison is obviously weaker than that arising from the corresponding non-contingent risk comparison, but we show that the two stochastic orders are closely related, so that the answer to a non-contingent risk comparison problem always provides the answer to the corresponding contingent risk comparison problem. In addition to showing the connection between parallel contingent and non-contingent risk comparison problems, we articulate a method for solving both kinds of problems using the “basis” approach. The basis approach has often been used implicitly, but we argue that there is value in making its use explicit, particularly in indicating which new, previously unsolved problems can readily be solved by the basis approach and which cannot.

Keywords: Stochastic dominance; Central riskiness; Comparative statics under uncertainty; Increase in risk (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D81 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s10713-018-0026-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Journal Article: New methods in the classical economics of uncertainty: comparing risks (2018) Downloads
Working Paper: New Methods in the Classical Economics of Uncertainty: Comparing Risks (1996)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:geneva:v:43:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1057_s10713-018-0026-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10713

Access Statistics for this article

The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory is currently edited by Michael Hoy and Nicolas Treich

More articles in The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory from Springer, International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().

 
Page updated 2019-11-06
Handle: RePEc:kap:geneva:v:43:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1057_s10713-018-0026-y