Assessing the performance of Portuguese public hospitals before and during COVID-19 outbreak, with optimistic and pessimistic benchmarking approaches

Guilherme Mendes Vara (), Marta Castilho Gomes () and Diogo Cunha Ferreira ()
Additional contact information
Guilherme Mendes Vara: CEGIST, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa
Marta Castilho Gomes: CERIS, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa
Diogo Cunha Ferreira: CEGIST, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa

Health Care Management Science, 2025, vol. 28, issue 1, No 1, 27 pages

Abstract: Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on the tertiary sector, particularly in healthcare, which faced unprecedented demand despite the existence of limited resources, such as hospital beds, staffing resources, and funding. The magnitude and global scale of this crisis provide a compelling incentive to thoroughly analyse its effects. This study aims to identify best practices within the Portuguese national healthcare service, with the goal of improving preparedness for future crises and informing policy decisions. Using a Benefit-of-the-Doubt (BoD) approach, this research constructs composite indicators to assess the pandemic's impact on the Portuguese public hospitals. The study analyzes monthly data from 2017 to May 2022, highlighting critical trends and performance fluctuations during this period. The findings reveal that each COVID-19 wave led to a decline in hospital performance, with the first wave being the most severe due to a lack of preparedness. Furthermore, the pandemic worsened the disparities among examined hospitals. Pre-pandemic top performers in each group improved their performance and were more consistently recognized as benchmarks, with their average benchmark frequency increasing from 66.5% to 83.5%. These top entities demonstrated greater resilience and adaptability, further distancing themselves from underperforming hospitals, which saw declines in both performance scores and benchmark frequency, widening the performance gap. The superior performance of top entities can be attributed to pre-existing strategic tools and contextual factors that enabled them to withstand the pandemic's challenges more effectively. Highlights • The pandemic aggravated the differences between the hospitals examined. • The top-performing entities further distanced themselves from the remaining entities after the pandemic • Entities considered benchmarks before the pandemic remained the same, and became even more consistent during the pandemic. • The top-performing entities achieved higher scores than their pre-pandemic performance levels. • Benchmarking models for composite indicators with diverse decision-making preferences, and treatment of imperfect knowledge of data.

Keywords: Healthcare performance; Hospital efficiency; COVID-19 pandemic; Composite indicators; Benefit-of-the-Doubt; Benchmarking (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10729-024-09693-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:28:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10729-024-09693-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10729

DOI: 10.1007/s10729-024-09693-4

Access Statistics for this article

Health Care Management Science is currently edited by Yasar Ozcan

More articles in Health Care Management Science from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().