Lemonade or lemon?: Riegel-Neal and the consolidation of American banking

Ann Matasar and Joseph Heiney

International Advances in Economic Research, 2000, vol. 6, issue 2, 249-258

Abstract: Riegle-Neal altered the American banking landscape by eliminating the prohibitions against banking and branching, thus paving the way for banking mergers and interstate acquisitions across state lines. The law's proponents expected that it would lead to fewer but stronger banks more able to compete with domestic, nonbanking financial institutions and with foreign banks both at home and overseas. Detractors feared that fewer but larger banks would reduce services to individuals, small businesses, farmers, and small communities or increase the cost of these services. This paper finds that fears associated with Riegle-Neal have become mute because branching networks and de novo banks filled niches created or left vacant by large banks' expansionism. Copyright International Atlantic Economic Society 2000

Date: 2000
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02296106 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:iaecre:v:6:y:2000:i:2:p:249-258:10.1007/bf02296106

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/11294

DOI: 10.1007/BF02296106

Access Statistics for this article

International Advances in Economic Research is currently edited by Katherine S. Virgo

More articles in International Advances in Economic Research from Springer, International Atlantic Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().