A bioeconomic model for estimating potential economic damages from a hypothetical Asian beetle introduced via future trade with Cuba

Damian Adams, Andres Susaeta, Jose R. Soto, Frederick Rossi, Paloma Carton Grammont, William A. Messina, Frank H. Koch, Demian Gomez and Jiri Hulcr
Additional contact information
Jose R. Soto: University of Arizona
Frederick Rossi: University of Notre Dame
Paloma Carton Grammont: University of Florida
William A. Messina: University of Florida
Frank H. Koch: US Forest Service
Demian Gomez: University of Florida
Jiri Hulcr: University of Florida

Journal of Bioeconomics, 2020, vol. 22, issue 1, No 3, 33-58

Abstract: Abstract Although present United States (U.S.) policy restricts very nearly all Cuban commercial exports to the U.S., there is potential for the restrictions to be relaxed or perhaps even lifted at some point in the future. In light of the potential increased trade with Cuba, the potential arrival of invasive species such as bark beetles and ambrosia beetles—particularly from Asia via Cuban imports—could represent a serious threat for the southern U.S. forestlands. We develop a bioeconomic model that estimates potential economic damages to southern pine forests caused by the hypothetical introduction of an unknown Asian bark or ambrosia beetle via future trade with Cuba for the study period 2018–2050. We examine individual policies and combinations of them that could be considered in response to this hypothetical situation. Using the pre-revolution Cuban level of imports, the economic damages in absence of “any policy or management action” could reach $2.44 million ($76,250/year). These damages could be reduced to between $469,000 ($14,656/year) and $1.02 million ($31,875/year) if a risk mitigation policy (forest thinning) were implemented. When prevention polices are considered as the baseline, the risk mitigation policy (combined with prevention) is again observed to be the dominant policy. The differences between the various combinations with respect to the prevention policy are relatively minor ranging between $856,000 ($26,750/year) and $1.30 million ($40,635/year). These findings should be interpreted with caution given the limited amount of empirical data and policy assumptions, but they nonetheless can inform policy choices related to trade, pests, and Cuba.

Keywords: Bioeconomic modelling; Asian bark/ambrosia beetle; Forests; Damages; Trade; Cuba; F13; Q57; Q23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10818-019-09289-x Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jbioec:v:22:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s10818-019-09289-x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... al/journal/10818/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10818-019-09289-x

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Bioeconomics is currently edited by Ulrich Witt, Michael T. Ghiselin and David Sloan Wilson

More articles in Journal of Bioeconomics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().