The Positive Side of Negative Labelling
Ynte Dam () and
Journal of Consumer Policy, 2015, vol. 38, issue 1, 19-38
Ethical labels signal positive ethical quality of a product but fail to create massive demand for such products. Based on regulatory focus theory and prospect theory, it is argued that negative signalling of low ethical quality would have a stronger effect on the adoption of ethical products than the current positive signalling of high ethical quality. The effect of positive versus negative signalling of high versus low ethical quality on attitude and preference formation is tested in three experimental studies (N = 81; N = 170; N = 177). Results show (1) that negative labelling has more effect on attitude and preference than positive labelling, (2) that the effect of labelling is enhanced by regulatory fit, and (3) that the effect of labelling is mediated by personal norms. No evidence of either mediation or moderation by environmental concern was found. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015
Keywords: Negative labelling; Consumption; Sustainability; Regulatory fit; Personal norms (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jcopol:v:38:y:2015:i:1:p:19-38
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... es/journal/10603/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Consumer Policy is currently edited by Hans Micklitz, John Thøgersen, Lucia A. Reisch, Alan Mathios and Christian Twigg-Flesner
More articles in Journal of Consumer Policy from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().