Who is Victimized by Fraud? Evidence from Consumer Protection Cases
D. Raval ()
Additional contact information
D. Raval: Federal Trade Commission
Journal of Consumer Policy, 2021, vol. 44, issue 1, No 3, 43-72
Abstract This paper examines how fraud victimization varies across communities using data on victims from 23 consumer protection law enforcement actions. These cases span several different types of fraudulent activity, including payday loan, student debt relief, health care, and business opportunity scams, providing evidence on how demographics vary across types of fraud. For these cases, victim rates are higher in more heavily black, higher income, older, and more urban communities and are lower in more heavily Hispanic, higher household size, higher credit score, and more college-educated communities.
Keywords: Victimization; Fraud; Demographics; Consumer protection (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10603-020-09466-w Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jcopol:v:44:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10603-020-09466-w
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... es/journal/10603/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Consumer Policy is currently edited by Hans Micklitz, John Thøgersen, Lucia A. Reisch, Alan Mathios and Christian Twigg-Flesner
More articles in Journal of Consumer Policy from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().