Mechanics of replacing benefit systems with a basic income: comparative results from a microsimulation approach

James Browne and Herwig Immervoll

The Journal of Economic Inequality, 2017, vol. 15, issue 4, No 3, 325-344

Abstract: Abstract Recent debates of basic income (BI) proposals shine a useful spotlight on the challenges that traditional forms of income support are increasingly facing, and highlight gaps in social provisions that largely depend on income or employment status. A universal “no questions asked” public transfer would be simple and have the advantage that no-one would be left without support. But an unconditional payment to everyone at meaningful but fiscally realistic levels would likely require tax rises as well as reductions in existing benefits. We develop a comprehensive BI scenario that facilitates an assessment of the resulting fiscal and distributional effects in a comparative context, undertake a microsimulation study to quantify them, and propose a simple decomposition to identify the mechanisms that drive effects in different country contexts. Results illustrate the challenges, but also the strengths, of existing social protection systems. A BI would fix benefit coverage gaps that exist in many countries, but would require very substantial tax rises if it were to be set at a meaningful level. As support would not be targeted on those most in need, it would not be a cost-effective way of directly reducing income poverty.

Keywords: Basic income; Targeting; Individualisation; Conditionality; Microsimulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (22)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10888-017-9366-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Mechanics of replacing benefit systems with a basic income: comparative results from a microsimulation approach (2018)
Working Paper: Mechanics of replacing benefits systems with a basic income: Comparative results from a microsimulation approach (2018)
Journal Article: Mechanics of replacing benefit systems with a basic income: comparative results from a microsimulation approach (2017)
Working Paper: Mechanics of Replacing Benefit Systems with a Basic Income: Comparative Results from a Microsimulation Approach (2017)
Working Paper: Mechanics of Replacing Benefit Systems with a Basic Income: Comparative Results from a Microsimulation Approach (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jecinq:v:15:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10888-017-9366-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... th/journal/10888/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10888-017-9366-6

Access Statistics for this article

The Journal of Economic Inequality is currently edited by Stephen Jenkins

More articles in The Journal of Economic Inequality from Springer, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().