Bounded rationality and heterogeneous expectations: Euler versus anticipated-utility approach
Giovanni Di Bartolomeo (),
Marco Di Pietro () and
Carolina Serpieri ()
Additional contact information
Elton Beqiraj: Sapienza University of Rome
Journal of Economics, 2020, vol. 130, issue 3, No 2, 249-273
Abstract By using Bayesian techniques, our paper investigates behavioral New-Keynesian DSGE models derived under two parsimonious alternatives to introduce heterogeneous expectations: the Euler equation and the anticipated-utility approach. First, we explore the relation between the expectation formation processes and the model determinacy for a broad range of parameterizations by using global sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo filtering. Second, we perform model comparison to assess how much the two alternatives are consistent with macro and expectation survey data. Our main results are twofold: (1) model determinacy is strongly undermined by the presence of boundedly rational agents; (2) a behavioral model based on Euler equation approach fits the data decisively better than one based on anticipated utility.
Keywords: Monetary policy; Bounded rationality; Heterogeneous expectations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E52 E58 J51 E24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00712-020-00697-6 Abstract (text/html)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jeczfn:v:130:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s00712-020-00697-6
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economics is currently edited by Giacomo Corneo
More articles in Journal of Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().