Family Perspectives on Childcare Subsidy Recertification in New Mexico: Barriers, Facilitators, and Implications for Family Stability

Hailey Heinz (), Rebecca Fowler, Darlene Castillo, Andrew L. Breidenbach, Ruth Juarez and Bibek Acharya
Additional contact information
Hailey Heinz: University of New Mexico, Cradle to Career Policy Institute
Rebecca Fowler: University of New Mexico, Cradle to Career Policy Institute
Darlene Castillo: University of New Mexico, Cradle to Career Policy Institute
Andrew L. Breidenbach: University of New Mexico, Cradle to Career Policy Institute
Ruth Juarez: University of New Mexico, Cradle to Career Policy Institute
Bibek Acharya: University of New Mexico, Cradle to Career Policy Institute

Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 2025, vol. 46, issue 3, No 19, 935-953

Abstract: Abstract Subsidies that reduce childcare costs for low-income families have been linked with benefits including increases in parental employment and use of higher quality care. However, these benefits accrue mainly to families who access subsidies for sustained periods. The recertification process, whereby families must periodically document that they are still eligible for subsidies, has been identified as administratively burdensome and as a barrier to continuous subsidy enrollment. Drawing on a novel survey (n = 501) and interviews (n = 64) with families in New Mexico, this study used logistic regression and thematic analysis to examine family characteristics associated with successful recertification, facilitators and impediments to successful recertification, reasons for subsidy exit, and implications of recertification processes for family stability. Results showed families with full-time employment, fewer adults in the home, and lower incomes had greater odds of recertifying successfully without a gap in benefits. Families’ primary reasons for exiting the subsidy program included changes to their childcare needs (e.g., COVID disruptions or children aging into kindergarten), and changes to their eligibility due to increased income or leaving the workforce. Families reported that recertification was less burdensome when they received clear and consistent communication from eligibility workers or navigation support from their care providers. When subsidy benefits were lost, participants reported adverse consequences for their care arrangements and employment circumstances. They also described adverse outcomes of maintaining their eligibility, such as turning down pay increases.

Keywords: Administrative burden; Mixed methods; Interviews; Childcare subsidies; Recertification; State policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10834-024-10005-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jfamec:v:46:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10834-024-10005-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... es/journal/10834/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10834-024-10005-9

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Family and Economic Issues is currently edited by Joyce Serido

More articles in Journal of Family and Economic Issues from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().