The StoNED age: the departure into a new era of efficiency analysis? A monte carlo comparison of StoNED and the “oldies” (SFA and DEA)
Mark Andor and
Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2014, vol. 41, issue 1, 85-109
Based on the seminal paper of Farrell (J R Stat Soc Ser A (General) 120(3):253–290, 1957 ), researchers have developed several methods for measuring efficiency. Nowadays, the most prominent representatives are nonparametric data envelopment analysis (DEA) and parametric stochastic frontier analysis (SFA), both introduced in the late 1970s. Researchers have been attempting to develop a method which combines the virtues—both nonparametric and stochastic—of these “oldies”. The recently introduced Stochastic non-smooth envelopment of data (StoNED) by Kuosmanen and Kortelainen (J Prod Anal 38(1):11–28, 2012 ) is such a promising method. This paper compares the StoNED method with the two “oldies” DEA and SFA and extends the initial Monte Carlo simulation of Kuosmanen and Kortelainen (J Prod Anal 38(1):11–28, 2012 ) in several directions. We show, among others, that, in scenarios without noise, the rivalry is still between the “oldies”, while in noisy scenarios, the nonparametric StoNED PL now constitutes a promising alternative to the SFA ML. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014
Keywords: Efficiency; Stochastic non-smooth envelopment of data (StoNED); Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Stochastic frontier analysis (SFA); Monte carlo simulation; C14; C52; D24; L59 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: The StoNED Age: The Departure Into a New Era of Efficiency Analysis? – A Monte Carlo Comparison of StoNED and the "Oldies" (SFA and DEA) (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jproda:v:41:y:2014:i:1:p:85-109
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/11123/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Productivity Analysis is currently edited by William Greene, Chris O'Donnell and Victor Podinovski
More articles in Journal of Productivity Analysis from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().