Persistent and transient productive inefficiency: a maximum simulated likelihood approach

Massimo Filippini and William Greene

Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2016, vol. 45, issue 2, 187-196

Abstract: The productive efficiency of a firm can be seen as composed of two parts, one persistent and one transient. The received empirical literature on the measurement of productive efficiency has paid relatively little attention to the difference between these two components. Ahn and Sickles (Econ Rev 19(4):461–492, 2000 ) suggested some approaches that pointed in this direction. The possibility was also raised in Greene (Health Econ 13(10):959–980, 2004 . doi: 10.1002/hec.938 ), who expressed some pessimism over the possibility of distinguishing the two empirically. Recently, Colombi (A skew normal stochastic frontier model for panel data, 2010 ) and Kumbhakar and Tsionas (J Appl Econ 29(1):110–132, 2012 ), in a milestone extension of the stochastic frontier methodology have proposed a tractable model based on panel data that promises to provide separate estimates of the two components of efficiency. The approach developed in the original presentation proved very cumbersome actually to implement in practice. Colombi ( 2010 ) notes that FIML estimation of the model is ‘complex and time consuming.’ In the sequence of papers, Colombi ( 2010 ), Colombi et al. (A stochastic frontier model with short-run and long-run inefficiency random effects, 2011 , J Prod Anal, 2014 ), Kumbhakar et al. (J Prod Anal 41(2):321–337, 2012 ) and Kumbhakar and Tsionas ( 2012 ) have suggested other strategies, including a four step least squares method. The main point of this paper is that full maximum likelihood estimation of the model is neither complex nor time consuming. The extreme complexity of the log likelihood noted in Colombi ( 2010 ), Colombi et al. ( 2011 , 2014 ) is reduced by using simulation and exploiting the Butler and Moffitt (Econometrica 50:761–764, 1982 ) formulation. In this paper, we develop a practical full information maximum simulated likelihood estimator for the model. The approach is very effective and strikingly simple to apply, and uses all of the sample distributional information to obtain the estimates. We also implement the panel data counterpart of the Jondrow et al. (J Econ 19(2–3):233–238, 1982 ) estimator for technical or cost inefficiency. The technique is applied in a study of the cost efficiency of Swiss railways. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Keywords: Productive efficiency; Stochastic frontier analysis; Panel data; Transient and persistent efficiency; C1; C23; D2; D24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (110)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11123-015-0446-y (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Persistent and Transient Productive Inefficiency: A Maximum Simulated Likelihood Approach (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jproda:v:45:y:2016:i:2:p:187-196

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/11123/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11123-015-0446-y

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Productivity Analysis is currently edited by William Greene, Chris O'Donnell and Victor Podinovski

More articles in Journal of Productivity Analysis from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().