The ‘wrong skewness’ problem: a re-specification of stochastic frontiers

Graziella Bonanno (), Domenico De Giovanni and Filippo Domma ()
Additional contact information
Domenico De Giovanni: Statistics and Finance, University of Calabria
Filippo Domma: Statistics and Finance, University of Calabria

Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2017, vol. 47, issue 1, No 4, 49-64

Abstract: Abstract In this paper, we study the ‘wrong skewness phenomenon’ in stochastic frontiers (SF), which consists in the observed difference between the expected and estimated sign of the asymmetry of the composite error, and causes the ‘wrong skewness problem’, for which the estimated inefficiency in the whole industry is zero. We propose a more general and flexible specification of the SF model, introducing dependences between the two error components and asymmetry (positive or negative) of the random error. This re-specification allows us to decompose the third moment of the composite error into three components, namely: (i) the asymmetry of the inefficiency term; (ii) the asymmetry of the random error; and (iii) the structure of dependence between the error components. This decomposition suggests that the wrong skewness anomaly is an ill-posed problem, because we cannot establish ex ante the expected sign of the asymmetry of the composite error. We report a relevant special case that allows us to estimate the three components of the asymmetry of the composite error and, consequently, to interpret the estimated sign. We present two empirical applications. In the first dataset, where the classic SF has the wrong skewness, an estimation of our model rejects the dependence hypothesis, but accepts the asymmetry of the random error, thus justifying the sign of the skewness of the composite error. More importantly, we estimate a non-zero inefficiency, thus solving the wrong skewness problem. In the second dataset, where the classic SF does not yield any anomaly, an estimation of our model provides evidence for the presence of dependence. In such situations, we show that there is a remarkable difference in the efficiency distribution between the classic SF and our class of models.

Keywords: Stochastic frontier models; Skewness; Generalized logistic distribution; Dependence; Copula functions; C43; C61; Q12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11123-017-0492-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: THE “WRONG SKEWNESS” PROBLEM: A RE-SPECIFICATION OF STOCHASTIC FRONTIERS (2015)
Working Paper: The “wrong skewness” problem: a re-specification of Stochastic Frontiers (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jproda:v:47:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11123-017-0492-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/11123/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11123-017-0492-8

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Productivity Analysis is currently edited by William Greene, Chris O'Donnell and Victor Podinovski

More articles in Journal of Productivity Analysis from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().