To chain or not to chain? measuring real GDP in the US and the choice of index number
Nicholas Oulton
Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2025, vol. 63, issue 1, No 1, 16 pages
Abstract:
Abstract National Statistical Institutes (NSIs) in advanced countries have generally adopted chain-linking in their national accounts. The United States uses a chained Fisher, an example of a superlative index number, in its national accounts. However the Fisher is only one of an infinite number of superlative index numbers. So an important issue is how sensitive are the estimates of output growth to the choice of index number. This issue is analysed by examining data from the BEA/BLS industry-level integrated production account, 1987–2020. Estimates of superlative and other index numbers are presented for this dataset. The sensitivity of real GDP growth to the value of the crucial parameter in a superlative index number is tested. The extent to which the desirable characteristics of value consistency and aggregation consistency are satisfied for different superlative index numbers is also analysed. The desirability of chain-linking does not follow automatically just from the use of superlative indices. So I also compare chained and unchained versions of these same index numbers. Finally, Europe uses a different approach to output measurement to the US, chained Laspeyres versus chained Fisher. I look at how different US estimates would be if they employed European methodology.
Keywords: E01; C43; O47; O51; Chain-linking; GDP; Index numbers (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11123-024-00732-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: To chain or not to chain? measuring real GDP in the US and the choice of index number (2025) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jproda:v:63:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11123-024-00732-4
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/11123/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s11123-024-00732-4
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Productivity Analysis is currently edited by William Greene, Chris O'Donnell and Victor Podinovski
More articles in Journal of Productivity Analysis from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().