The Costs of Free Land: The Oklahoma Land Rushes
Cecil Bohanon and
Philip Coelho ()
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 1998, vol. 16, issue 2, 205-21
There is an extensive literature in economic history on the disposition of public lands of the United States. Absent from this literature is any consideration of the Oklahoma Territory and the two unusual methods used to dispose of its lands. One method was a land rush where entrants literally raced to claim surveyed lots; the other was a lottery where random chance determined who won. This article develops a model of resource allocation applicable to land rushes and lotteries and examines evidence drawn from the Oklahoma land competitions. The model suggests that rent dissipation occurred. The available evidence corroborates this: some, if not all, of the benefits participants gained from the allocation of "free lands" were dissipated, although there are distinguishable differences in the real costs imposed by the two methods. Copyright 1998 by Kluwer Academic Publishers
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0895-5638/contents link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jrefec:v:16:y:1998:i:2:p:205-21
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ce/journal/11146/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics is currently edited by Steven R. Grenadier, James B. Kau and C.F. Sirmans
More articles in The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().