The St. Petersburg Paradox at 300
Christian Seidl
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2013, vol. 46, issue 3, 247-264
Abstract:
Nicolas Bernoulli’s discovery in 1713 that games of hazard may have infinite expected value, later called the St. Petersburg Paradox, initiated the development of expected utility in the following three centuries. An account of the origin and the solution concepts proposed for the St. Petersburg Paradox is provided. D’Alembert’s ratio test is used for a uniform treatment of the manifestations of the St. Petersburg Paradox and its solution proposals. It is also shown that a St. Petersburg Paradox can be solved or regained by appropriate transformations of the winnings or their utilities on the one hand or the probabilities on the other. This last feature is novel for the analysis of the St. Petersburg Paradox. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013
Keywords: St. Petersburg Paradox; Expected utility; Games of hazard; Risk attitude; D81; B16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11166-013-9165-9 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: The Petersburg Paradox at 300 (2012) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:46:y:2013:i:3:p:247-264
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ry/journal/11166/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s11166-013-9165-9
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty is currently edited by W. Kip Viscusi
More articles in Journal of Risk and Uncertainty from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().