Economics at your fingertips  

On preference imprecision

Robin Cubitt (), Daniel Navarro-Martinez and Chris Starmer ()

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2015, vol. 50, issue 1, 1-34

Abstract: Recent research invokes preference imprecision to explain violations of individual decision theory. While these inquiries are suggestive, the nature and significance of such imprecision remain poorly understood. We explore three questions using a new measurement tool in an experimental investigation of imprecision in lottery valuations: Does such preference imprecision vary coherently with lottery structure? Is it stable on repeat measurement? Does it have explanatory value for economic behaviour? We find that imprecision behaves coherently, shows no tendency to change systematically with experience, is related to choice variability, but is not a main driver of the violations of standard decision theory that we consider. Copyright The Author(s) 2015

Keywords: Preference imprecision; Imprecision intervals; Noisy preferences; Violations of expected utility theory; Construct validity; D81; C91; D01; D03 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ry/journal/11166/PS2

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty is currently edited by W. Kip Viscusi

More articles in Journal of Risk and Uncertainty from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().

Page updated 2018-12-12
Handle: RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:50:y:2015:i:1:p:1-34