Only connect: Why government often ignores research
Lawrence Mead ()
Policy Sciences, 2015, vol. 48, issue 2, 257-272
Abstract:
Most academic research on public policy achieves little influence in government. The disconnect reflects the different ways researchers and government learn about policy. In social policy, typically, scholars make rigorous but narrow arguments about how to improve social conditions while saying little about politics or government. Policymakers, however, reason in broader, integrative ways and pay more attention to program experience and institutions. Evaluations have influence in part because they serve the governmental style. By reasoning more like policymakers, scholars could have greater influence. But to make that connection, the teaching of public policy and academic incentives must change. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015
Keywords: Policy analysis; Policy learning; Social policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11077-015-9216-y (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:policy:v:48:y:2015:i:2:p:257-272
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ce/journal/11077/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s11077-015-9216-y
Access Statistics for this article
Policy Sciences is currently edited by Michael Howlett
More articles in Policy Sciences from Springer, Society of Policy Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().